1SmartSolution Blog:: Finding something new where you never thought you will

Finding something new where you never thought you will

Posted At : Nov 13, 2008 19:11 PM | Posted By : Ed Tabara
Related Categories: ColdFusion

Did you know there exist an IMP operator in ColdFusion? Well, i didn't even after 8 years of day to day ColdFusion usage.
Found it accidentally when trying to have a variable name IMP.
For thouse who find IMP new too, here is how it work:

If the joiner is IMP and the first clause is false, the entire statement is true and the second will never run.

As opposite to AND and OR:

If the joiner is AND and the first clause is false, the entire statement is false and the second clause will never run.
If the joiner is OR and the first clause is true, then the entire statement is true and the second will never run.

Comments (3) |

Print |

Send | 1877 Views | 9% / 19% Popularity

Comments

The same as "not x and y"

# Posted By ike | Nov 13, 2008 19:29 PM

Well. One learns something every day! In my case: two things in one day today. I looked up the docs and there's this EQV operator too. I didn't know about that either.
Cheers for the heads up.
Ike: you might want to revisit the logic of your assertion there I think: they're not the same.
Ed: your summary of how the processing of IMP is short-circuited is spot on, but it's not telling the whole picture.
If the first operand is true, then we care about the second operand, and that operand must be true for the expression to be true. If the first operand is false, the expression is true irrespective of the value of the second operator.
This is very interesting. I wonder how much of my mangled boolean contortions could have been avoided had I known about this.
Cheers!
--
Adam

# Posted By Adam Cameron | Nov 13, 2008 23:19 PM

Yeah, this is very interesting, although to be honest, I think I'd probably have used EQV more often.
So IMP works like this:
T+T = T
T+F = F
F+T = T
F+F = T
In ColdFusion, NOT x AND y is
T+T = F
T+F = F
F+T = T
F+F = F
(Remember NOT has higher precedence than AND.)
It's closer if you write NOT (x AND y):
T+T = F
T+F = T
F+T = T
F+F = T
But what you really want is NOT (x AND NOT y). And if you find yourself wanting that, then IMP would definitely be easier! (Although it might not be as understandable ... I think you'd want to comment that code.

# Posted By Dave DuPlantis | Nov 14, 2008 15:21 PM

Search

Links

unlock cell phone

shopping cart software

Best Coldfusion Hosting & 50% discount

Open Source

Calendar

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31

Tags Cloud

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog.

Name:
Email:
Website:
Comment:

Remember my information:
Subscribe:

ColdFusion	142	[RSS]
Other	88	[RSS]
My Projects	56	[RSS]
Fun	41	[RSS]
SQL	33	[RSS]
RIA	18	[RSS]
1ssBlog	16	[RSS]
Deals	13	[RSS]
cfSQLMaster	12	[RSS]
Caching	8	[RSS]
Profit	7	[RSS]
cfHSSF	5	[RSS]
Transerfing	5	[RSS]
AJAX	4	[RSS]
cfFirewall	4	[RSS]
cfWatcher	4	[RSS]
JavaScript	3	[RSS]
1ssChat	2	[RSS]
Adobe Air	1	[RSS]
Security	1	[RSS]

ColdFusion:	$77,000
PHP:	$75,000
ASP:	$77,000
Adobe Flex:	$92,000

Categories

My Sites

Hi-Tech Reviews

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

CFBloggers

Indeed Salaries

Search

Links

Open Source

Calendar

Tags Cloud

Subscribe

Adobe Feeds